Get Today in Masonic History into your Inbox. Sign up today for one of our email lists!
Need an article for your Trestleboard/Newsletter see our Use Policy

TODAY in Masonic History:

Facebook Twitter Google

Freemasonry V. Catholicism

Today in Masonic History we present Freemasonry V. Catholicism.

Freemasonry and Catholicism have had a bad relationship for many centuries. The purpose of this article is not to place "blame" for these issues, it is merely to make them known, there is already too much hate in the world.

Freemasonry and the Catholic church are arguably two of the oldest organizations in the World. Speculative Freemasonry and the Catholic church have never gotten along. I say Speculative since it is probable Operative Freemasons did on some level "get along" with the Catholic church since they were the ones building the cathedrals of Europe. It is unclear where the friction between Freemasonry and Catholicism comes from, although there may be some who will post on social media why they think it is, the real reason is lost in time.

One possible reason given, is due to Pope Clement XII. He issued the first papal bull against Freemasonry stating "For which reason the temporal and spiritual communities are enjoined, in the name of holy obedience, neither to enter the society of Freemasons, to disseminate its principles, to defend it, nor to admit nor conceal it within their houses or places, or elsewhere, under the pain of excommunication ipso facto, for all acting in contradiction to this, and from which the pope only can absolve the dying." Although this still does not answer why. A cardinal-nephew of Clement XII wrote in a letter it had nothing to do with ideology and everything to do with the fact a lodge in Florence was corrupt. This claim is interesting since a cardinal nephew of Pope Clement XI, Clement XI and Clement XII are only separated by nine years, Phillip Von Stosch, is the person who started the lodge. It's claimed prior to condemning Freemasonry, Clement XII petitioned the lodge for membership, there is no evidence it ever happened.

Despite the fact Pope Clement XII was the one who officially created the papal bull, there were previous statements from the Catholic church stating it's dislike for Freemasonry. As early as the 1500's there are statements being made by clergy referring to Freemasonry as Judeo-Freemasonry, more than likely trying to tie Judaism with Freemasonry as there was an anti-semitic sentiment in Europe at the time. Again this doesn't tell us the why, merely Freemasonry is, in the eyes of the church, not good.

In more modern times it is has been stated a Freemason has secrets he cannot tell his priest, which violates the Confessional. From a historical perspective it is unclear when private confession became a sacrament. It is first mentioned in the council of Trent in 1551. At the time they stated "private confession has always been a part of the Catholic church." There are those, even within the Catholic Church, who question this assertion. The statement coincides with some of the anti-masonic rhetoric occurring in the 1500's.

It has also been said the papal bull was about secret societies as a whole. The fact is Freemasonry is not a secret society, it is a society with secrets, just like the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic sponsored fraternal organization.

Regardless of the reason for the papal bull, it became a source for hate between the two organizations. In the 1800's a man named Leo Taxil put himself at the center of the issue of Freemasonry V. Catholicism. Taxil tried to join a Masonic lodge because of his anti-Catholic and anti-cleric views. When his motives were discovered he was told he could not progress in the fraternity, he had only attained his first degree, and left the fraternity. Taxil became enraged and began writing anti-Masonic books, claiming he was privy to the horrible secrets of Freemasonry. To this day, Taxil's book are cited as proof of the horrific things going on in Freemasonry even though Taxil, in an attempt to embarrass the Catholic Church, held a press conference and admitted he made everything up.

Up to this point I am sure people reading this article are saying I am writing this in defense of Freemasonry, so let's change the tone. Freemasonry does not have a Pope, there is not even a central authority for Freemasonry around the World. While some jurisdictions I am sure have policies about Catholics not being allowed to join. Some masons, out of spite, may want Catholics banned from joining. This is wholly unmasonic in my view. It has become a situation where people who don't understand the history, make assumptions and declare Catholics need not apply. I recently read an article where someone wrote negatively about the Catholic church, largely because of the ban on it's members joining the fraternity. The article itself was fairly hostile blaming Catholics themselves for supporting the ban.

Freemasonry can do nothing to change the ban on Catholics joining the fraternity, it is something, in my opinion Freemasons need to let it go. As I stated at the start of this article there is plenty of hate already. Not long ago I read a Catholic forum where someone asked the question what they should do with some Masonic books they found belonging to their grandfather or great-grandfather. The vast majority of people responding to the post told the person to burn the books and anything else appearing masonic. Much of the rhetoric was hate filled and the mini-book burning turned into other hate filled rants toward the Masonic fraternity. Although I have not personally seen them, I have little doubt similar rants exist going in the other direction.

Regardless of the reason for the papal bull banning Freemasons from the Catholic church, Freemasons should always remember we are admonished not to allow ourselves to be drawn into arguments with those who may not understand the Masonic fraternity. We should also practice the hidden jewel in Freemasonry, Tolerance.

This article provided by Brother Eric C. Steele.